Disney Loves Single Parenthood and Princesses Who Make Piss Poor Decisions
I am a Disney fan, and I grew up watching all the cartoons like so many others did. Disney is basically an institution that’s wrapped all up through my childhood memories but when one thinks about their movies, you’ll realize that they aren’t all honky dory.
Disney movies are ALWAYS about some major loss of a loved one. ALLATAHM. The central character of every Disney film or cartoon always suffers a loss that’s super close to them and life-altering. And most of this loss involves the character’s parent. The instances where a character has a mother, odds are there’s no daddy. There are VERY few Disney films where the main character has a complete nuclear family. Disney is the reason for single parenthood.
Disney killed Bambi‘s mama, Simba‘s Daddy, Cinderella‘s parents, Snow White‘s foster parents, Cruella‘s edges, etc. Ok I’m pretty sure Snow White didn’t have foster parents, but you get me. They stay slaying loved ones in their films. I guess Disney’s tryna tell kids “Life ain’t no crystal stair.” These emotional films of theirs stay having us in our feelings. You can barely watch one of their films without looking like this:
I don’t know why but Disney doesn’t love having mothers in their stories. In fact, methinks that the absence of mamas in their tales allow their main characters to make these piss poor decisions they’re known for. The lack of a female figure to look up to is central in some of the tragedy of these stories so I guess I get it. Mothers have a special way of snatching our wigs into better decision-making. No shade to fathers. You’re also important. There’s a REALLY good post on Suite101 about dead and missing parents in Disney flicks and what it could mean. You should read it.
Most of the Disney princesses were motherless too, including Jasmine, Belle, Snow White, Pocahontas, Ariel, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty. Maybe if they did have some strong lady role models, they’d know better than to make some of the choices they did.
I love the ladies but they were more flawed than scratched glass. Let us go through each one and see why they were basic.
Ariel (The Little Mermaid) – My girl gave up her voice so she could have legs so she could pursue Eric. Desperate, much??? Girl, he ain’t e’em worth all of that. And her voice was beautiful. She coulda went on “American Idol,” got famous and got a man who could pay for her fins to be turned to legs. I’m just saying. There are other ways!
Jasmine (Aladdin) – A whole princess who marries a thief whose only possessions are a flying carpet and a sassy monkey. Girl, I guess. You are TOO FAHN to settle for such rubbish. Yes, I know Aladdin’s hair was thick and luxurious and he had a 6-pack but there are others! Besides, the carpet ain’t e’em have no seat belts. Folks out here risking life for love.
Pocahontas – She slept with John Smith, the man who brought small pox and oppression to her tribe. Ok girl. I hope it was at least good. O___o John Smith wasn’t e’em all that cute for you to sell out your people over him.
Belle (Beauty and the Beast) – This victim of Stockholm Syndrome fell in love with the man who tried to kill her daddy and kidnapped her. What made her heart flutter for him? He gave her the key to this damb library. GIRL NAWL! I’m a lover of books as much as the next person but that was just some simple ish. Oh Belle… Cracked.com wrote a piece that talks about this called “5 Romantic Movie Gestures That Were Actually Dick Moves.”
Snow White – Methinks she was hallucinating those dwarfs. If I was stuck in the woods by myself, I’d think up 7 friends too. If Tom Hanks could have a BFF volleyball named “Wilson” then Snow White can certainly imagine 7 vertically-challenged beings living with her. I ain’t mad. The brain has many coping mechanisms.
Cinderella – Her prince clearly had a foot fetish. And, if I drop my glass shoe, I’m going back for it. DAMBNAT! They’da seen me in the palace in rags at 12:02am, holding a glass shoe and talmbout “Yeah I had to come back for this. IT’S TOO FIERCE TO LET GO!” Besides, if she danced with this prince all night, why doesn’t he remember her face? Did her fancy up-do REALLY serve as a mask? Lemme find out some Fairy Godmother-designed threads shroud your face. If I’m your true love, you better remember doing the wop with me for hours!
Sleeping Beauty – This poor child was in the predicament by no fault of her own. She got killed by an evil witch and the only thing that brought her back to life was when a random dude stuck his tongue down her throat.
Mulan isn’t on this list because she seems to be the anti-Disney princess. She got her mama, daddy, granny and cricket to help her with her daily life. AND she was probably the one who made the least bad decisions. In fact, she was a G! Homegirl went to war to save her daddy and her country. Go’n ‘head, MU!
And Rapunzel, Rapunzel let down your lacefront!
So yes, these motherless children made some epically bad decisions all in the name of love and other random themes. But the lack of moms in Disney movies is definitely obvious. Was Walt Disney working through some feelings? I sure do wonder.
But then again, I know a lot of Disney films are based on old fairy tales and orphans are common in them, and so are huge tragedies. And at least they clean up some of the endings. In the original story of “The Little Mermaid” apparently, Ariel dies and Prince Eric marries someone else. OOP. WELP.
I still love Disney though, for the memories, in spite of the fact that they’re racist, sexist and anti-mothers. They do epic movies that tug at your heart strings and leave your eyes sweating as if your pupils ran a marathon. But did they have to kill Nemo’s mama like that? Dang.
Anywho, what Disney princess do you think made the poorest decisions?
Edit: I didn’t include Princess Tiana in this because I only remember a little of that story (and have seen it once). I was underwhelmed by “Princess and the Frog” but that’s another story for another day.
Category: Movies
Subscribe
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.
Mulan’s not a princess so she’s allowed to be a badass and her family is allowed to remain in tact. The moral is “don’t go chasing after princes if you wanna keep your momma”
LOLLL they are boy crazy. All of em but Mulan said NAWL! I like her.
I cannot watch Disney movies. Too damn sad. I saw the Lion King and was so distraught over Mufasa (sp?) getting killed, I straight lost it in the theater. Maybe it was PMS, I can’t say. This little boy in front of me turned around and said, “You do know this is a movie right? It ain’t real. Get a hold of yourself.” I’m done.
LMAO you had a little kid side-eyeing you? WELP. But yeah, they are sad dinnamug. Leaving you all verklempt.
My uncle took me to see the “Lion King” a week or two after my father died. I was 8.
I went to Jesus on THIS post. dead and gone. Your uncle needs his ass beat
You forgot about the black princess Tiana. Yea she was parentless, yea her white friend did better than her, yea she was reduced to an amphibian…wait what was my point…Oh yes that it wasn’t only about love and beauty, she actually got a chance to work hard to realize her own dreams. I think Disney got the message somewhat by the time it got to that movie.
Princess Tiana had a mom, her dad was dead though.
Ya know, I did kinda forget about Princess Tiana. It might be because “Princess and the Frog” is the only one I’ve seen once. I’m not too familiar with it. I need to rewatch it.
I also think they half-assed that film but that’s another discussion for another day.
What about Rapunzel and Tiana?
Also, Sleeping Beauty (Aurora) did have a mother. She was the queen in the kingdom.
Rapunzel, Rapunzel, let down your lacefront! Yeah I did forget about her.
Rapunzel’s mamma had to give up her baby to the witch because she was GREEDY …WELP! The witch ho lived next door had some tempting fruit in her garden and she just had to have it . And thee said witch snatched up this couples baby as punishment for the theft her raises it as her own…can we say Ann Petteway..
Damn Luvvie, you went deep on this, opened a sistah’s eyes to some ish…
As a Disney stan, the psychological aspects of Disney films (particularly parenthood) has always intrigued me. Of course there was talk/rumors that Walt Disney’s motherless films having to do with the death of his mother. Which… it’s basically what all artists do. Same with Steven Spielberg always having that lack of father theme in his films.
But with Disney in particular, I think that may have been an urban legend since he would put these themes into practice BEFORE his mother’s death… and like you said that pretty much all the classics were based off of a story that has already been told (with The Lion King being less obvious… but it’s definitely a retelling of Macbeth lol).
YES CHEEKSTER!! As you lay down the Disney knowledge.
The Lion King is based off on Hamlet.
*of
LOL yeah it has been told to have similarities to both (and you’re right, it’s probably more Hamlet), but I guess I was focusing on Scar being similar to MacBeth since he was jealous of his brother, the king. And killed him.
Here comes the conspiracy theory…
I’ve read that Disney films are very well put together as in displaying and sending a specific message. Back in the cold war days they used Disney cartoons to push propaganda and get people to pay their income taxes to help fund the war and it worked wonders. It worked so well that the Nazi’s consulted with Disney to use their techniques.
Disney presents the broken home too may times to count. The children (young ladies specificly) are their targets to push negative views on sister hood and the reliance on positive female mentors/mother figures. These characters rely on animals, witches, faries, dwarfs etc… to help them through life. If you have noticed the sisters of these Disney characters are always evil, conniving and untrustworthy. A man is always the savior and the one to be dependant on. These ladies have no mind of their own and put their trust in a man they barely know. They have no will power and are extremely niave and kind of loose (if you know what I mean).
Isn’t it wierd that Disney pushes this Monarchy on us?… We have no roalty, no castles, no crowns. So what do we do to fill that void we look up the people who reflect this kind of lifestyle. Who are these people?… Celebrities. They do what they want when they want. They are admired, loved and mimicked, they can get us to do whatever they want.
I said all that to say this…
Women as a whole are very powerful. We create life and are the back bone to every family. If you have an agenda the best way to get it ingrained in your target is to get them in their youth. Children are susceptible to anyting, as long as they are entertained they ask no questions.
I think Ariel was a fool. Loose your voice just to walk? Nah boo…seems like she was able to swim faster anyways..stick with what YOU KNOW. and plus she got to live in the ocean and have cool lobster, crab and fish friends. I mean she can totally hold her breath for hours on end..now that is a record to be proud of!
@NegroNerd
Ariel was a GOODT fool. Sacrificing everything for some dude who just thought she was pretty. Girl NAWL!!!
I learned more about Disney Princesses than I ever knew. I didn’t grow up watching the Disney princess films. Your post makes me wonder if my momma knew something I didnt. I watched The Little Mermaid and Lion King in college because the soundtracks were good.
Why didn’t you mention Tiana–the black one? I haven’t seen the film, but I’m hoping her story wasn’t as tragic.
Tiana lost her dad, worked hard, played hardly , & married a dude with no job who wanted to be in the music biz.
Hey, he was a prince he didn’t need a job. besides he taught her how to play and she taught him how to work. I liked her, she had spunk.
Sounds like a lot of dudes I know. Mooching off established sista’s and stay up in the studio!! LOL..
Your mama protected you from them. Tiana spent most of the movie as a frog. Meh.
Yes she did, but what I liked about that movie was that he fell in love with her because of her spirit not her beauty.
A few years ago, in a Marketing course, my class discussed the marketing ingenuity of Walt Disney films – more especially main characters living in a single parent environment. The class came to several different conclusions on how these disadvantages equal dollar signs for Walt Disney and Pixar.
It’s hard out there for a princess…
My sister and I were discussing the fact that the Lion King movies are based off of Shakespeare’s plays. The first Lion King movie being based off of Hamlet, Lion King 2 is based off of Romeo & Juliet, and the Lion King 1 1/2 movie is based off of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead (which isn’t a Shakespeare play, but involves the characters from Hamlet). If ANYONE knows tragedy, it’s Shakespeare.lol
YES! Give us that Shakespearean breakdown. Man, you just took me through a refresher of some of my lit classes.
Luvvie,
I simply CANNOT with you!!
*leaps off ground floor patio*
Tatiana was the only one who worked toward her dream and the only reason she kissed the frog was to get money because those bankers were selling the space to someone else and destroying her dream. The price fell in love with her because of her personally and was going to marry someone rich so he could fulfill his promise. I LOVE that story.
TATIANA!!!! LOL
By the time they had gotten to us, Tiana got the short straw, and non sparkly crown ( I am still salty over that one, but like you say, “..for another day” They all (except Mulan who was original G) had to “give it up” to fulfill their dreams…sad.
Whats good “left-eye”? I need you to know you have issues and waaaaay to much time on your hand to think of these topics. But hell I’m really no better cuz I read your insanity on a regular basis.
I agree there is usually a lack of one parent in most Disney films. But the point should be there is still one parent who offers no good advice or clear direction. There is more of a lack of good parenting.
I’m just going to leave you with this http://bios.weddingbee.com/pics/172791/tumblr_lwuoftDrLo1r2uhf7o1_500.jpg
I loathe you so much I love you.
The real story behind sleeping beauty is the witch cursed her and she touched the spinning wheel and slept for 100 years. A hunter had intercourse with her sleeping body. She got pregnant and had twins…while sleep. The boy twin was sucking on her thumb and sucked the splinter out. She woke up. The rapist hunter came back and saw she was awake. His wife found out about it and hired someone to kill sleeping beauty and the twins. The hunter killed her instead and married sleeping beauty.
Actually in the disney version of Sleeping Beauty (not the original) both of her parents are still alive and together, she just has to go live with fairies for 16 years. And as a previous poster mention both of Milan’s parents were alive and together and as another Previous poster said in Tangled Rapunzel’s parents are both alive and together she is just kidnapped from a which. Also in the Incredibles the parents are together and alive. In the sequels of the lion king and the little mermaid the original main characters (Simba and Nala in LK and Ariel and prince Eric in LM) are parents that are married and alive. Hercules is orphaned because he is turned mortal but his parents are still together and not dead, his adoptive parents are a barren married couple. And at the end of ‘The Aristocats’ Ditches and O’Malley wind up together and it is implanted that they are starting a blended family together.
Also Bageera, one of Mowglie’s animal guardian’s, is a Black panther not a tiger. There was a tiger in the story named Sher Kahn but he was trying to kill Mowglie, and possibly is the one who killed his birth parents. Mowglie’s original adopted parents were wolves that had a mom and dad that were alive and together.
Oops I made some errors because of the stupid auto correct on my phone:
*Rapuzel was kidnaped by a witch; not “from the which”
* Duchess and O’Malley; not “Ditchess”